The results of HLA-C typing were separated into two groups: HLA-C group 1 (C1), consisting of HLA-C 01, 03, 07 (01–06), 08, 12 (02, 03, 06), 14, 16 (01, 03, 04) and HLA-C group 2 (C2) consisting of HLA-C Selleckchem PD0325901 02, 04, 05, 06, 0707, 12 (04, 05), 15, 1602, 17, 18 [19]. HLA-C group 1 (C1) molecules bind to KIR2DS2, KIR2DL2 and KIR2DL3, while group 2 (C2) molecules bind to KIR2DS1 and KIR2DL1 [20]. Data were analysed using epi-infoversion 6·0 and spss version 16·0 software. The

carrier frequencies (CF) were compared using Yates’ corrected χ2 or Fisher’s exact test. Student’s t-test and Mann–Whitney test were used to perform between-group comparisons in which the dependent variables were parametric and non-parametric, respectively. Holm’s procedure for adjustment of the P-values for multiple comparisons was applied (with the aid of the WinPepisoftware version 9·4) and arlequin software (version 3·01) was used to determine linkage disequilibrium (LD) [21]. The crude and Mantel–Haenszel (M–H; for stratified analysis) odds ratios (OR), along with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), were calculated for alleles or combinations whose frequencies distributions were significantly different between patients and controls. Chi-square for evaluation of interactions was also performed. P-values

less than or equal to 0·05 were considered statistically significant. The clinical and demographic features of patients and controls are shown in Table 1. PD-0332991 molecular weight There was no significant difference in the frequencies of European descendants between the study groups, but patients had a higher mean age and tended towards a higher prevalence of female sex. HLA-C1 was positive in 80 (72·7%) patients and 87 (75·7%) controls (P = 0·727), and HLA-C2 was present in 67 (60·9%) patients and 73 (63·5%) controls (P = 0·795). Distribution of the KIR genes among patients and controls is compared in Table 2. The frequencies of the KIR genes in our control group were similar to other studies reported for Brazilian populations [22,23]. The proportion of controls with inhibitory KIR2DL2 receptors was Paclitaxel research buy significantly higher than that of patients with SSc (crude OR: 0·22, 95% CI: 0·12–0·40, adjusted

P < 0·0001; M–H OR, stratified for race and sex: 0·23, 95% CI: 0·13–0·41, adjusted P < 0·0001). Including only patients fulfilling the ACR criteria in the analysis, the results are very similar (crude OR: 0·21, 95% CI: 0·11–0·40, adjusted P < 0·0001; M–H OR: 0·22, 95% CI: 0·12–0·40, adjusted P < 0·0001). There was a statistical trend (adjusted P = 0·059) for lower prevalence of KIR2DS1 in patients. There was no significant difference in the frequencies of the other KIR genes. Analysing the combinations of KIR genes (Table 3), an association of KIR2DS2+/KIR2DL2- with systemic sclerosis was observed (crude OR: 19·29, 95% CI: 4·24–122·26, adjusted P < 0·0001; M–H OR, stratified for race and sex: 17·66; 95% CI: 4·19–74·36, adjusted P < 0·0001).