In our study, blood samples were not collected at Day 7 after the first dose or at Day 21 post-booster; thus, the GMT levels at 7 and 21 days post- priming and post-booster could not be compared. An anamnestic serum antibody immune response after the booster dose (a rapid increase in HI antibody titers at higher levels compared with post-priming) was suggested, however, by the rapid increase in HI antibody titers after administration of the booster dose. Although no formal comparison was proposed, the data from this study suggested that the HI antibody GMTs elicited by two doses of the 1.9 μg HA AS03B-adjuvanted H1N1/2009 vaccine

were higher than those elicited by one dose of the 15 μg HA non-adjuvanted vaccine from Day 42 onward. GDC-0449 order AS03 adjuvants are known to enhance immune responses to antigens and to improve vaccine efficacy [10]. During an influenza pandemic, it is important to achieve optimal protection against the circulating strain selleck chemical with minimal antigen content in order to facilitate production of the large number of vaccine doses required globally. In the current study, the AS03-adjuvanted vaccines with four and eight times less antigen content (3.75 μg and 1.9 μg HA, respectively), compared to the non-adjuvanted vaccine (15 μg HA), met the European regulatory criteria through Month 6. Furthermore, immune responses elicited by the 15 μg HA non-adjuvanted vaccine appeared similar to those elicited by one dose of 1.9 μg HA AS03B-adjuvanted

H1N1/2009 vaccine. These results are consistent with previous observations in children and adults showing that the use of adjuvants in pandemic influenza vaccines allowed antigen-sparing [36] and [37], with similar or stronger immune responses when compared to non-adjuvanted formulations [17], [18], [22], [30], [34] and [38]. No safety concerns were identified

for any of the study vaccines. Injection site reactogenicity was higher following AS03-adjuvanted vaccination versus non-adjuvanted vaccination, as observed previously with AS03-adjuvanted H1N1/2009 and all A/H5N1 vaccines in children [14], [21], [22] and [23]. The study had some inherent strengths. Firstly, the non-adjuvanted control group allowed direct comparison of the immune responses and reactogenicity between the AS03-adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted H1N1/2009 vaccines. Secondly, the design allowed the evaluation of whether two primary doses of the 1.9 μg HA AS03B-adjuvanted vaccine had long-term advantages over a single dose, which could be important in the context of antigen-sparing. And finally, the observer-blind design Libraries reduced the possibility of treatment bias, as the placebo dose at Day 21 allowed the blinding to be maintained throughout the study. There were some limitations in the study. Baseline antibody values suggest that many subjects were non H1N1/2009 naïve at the time of study start in 2010. Post-vaccination immune response was not assessed according to pre-vaccination serostatus.