5 ( Figures 3A–3E). Because Tbr2 may also label some differentiating neurons ( Pontious et al., 2008), we next

analyzed the fraction of these cells that also expressed the proliferation marker Ki67. We observed that the number of Tbr2+ progenitor cells (IPCs) in the cortex of Robo1/2 mutants was almost double than in controls at E12.5 ( Figures 3F–3H). Thus loss of Robo1/2 function leads to a depletion of VZ progenitors and to an abnormal increase in the numbers of IPCs in the developing cerebral cortex. Analysis of Robo1 and Robo2 single mutant embryos revealed that the phenotypic changes found in the cortex of Robo1/2 mutants were primarily due to the loss of Robo2 ( Figure S4). Nevertheless, the raise in the number of IPCs found in Robo2 single mutants Selleckchem Pifithrin �� is milder than in Robo1/2 double mutants, which suggested that Robo1 cooperates with Robo2 in regulating the production of IPCs. Altogether, these results indicated that Robo receptors modulate

neurogenesis in the developing brain. Slit proteins are the ligands of Robo receptors in cell guidance, and so we tested whether Slits PF-02341066 cell line also mediate the function of Robo receptors in neurogenesis. Analysis of the distribution of Slit1 and Slit2 mRNA at different developmental stages revealed multiple sources of Slit proteins that could influence telencephalic progenitor cells ( Figures 4A, 4B, and S5A–S5J). We were particularly intrigued by the expression of Slits in the choroid plexus and in other cells lining the ventricle, because recent work suggests that factors present in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) modulate the proliferation of cortical Monoiodotyrosine progenitor cells ( Lehtinen et al., 2011). Consistent with this idea, we found that Slit proteins are indeed present in the CSF of mouse embryos at E12.5 ( Figure 4C). We also observed that

a recombinant Slit2-alkaline phosphatase fusion protein (Slit2-AP) binds homogenously throughout the ventricular surface of E12.5 telencephalic hemispheres ( Figure 4D). This experiment reinforced the idea that Slits present in the CSF may bind to Robo receptors expressed by progenitor cells in contact with the ventricle, thereby modulating neurogenesis at early stages of cortical development. To directly test the function of Slits in regulating the proliferation of cortical progenitors, we analyzed progenitor cell dynamics in Slit mutants. Analysis of Slit1 and Slit2 single mutant embryos revealed no differences in the density of PH3+ VZ progenitor cells or in the number of Tbr2+ IPCs ( Figures S5K– S5R). In contrast, we found that the density of PH3+ nuclei in the VZ of the developing cortex was reduced in Slit1/2 double mutants compared to controls ( Figures 4E, 4F, and 4I). In addition, we observed that the amount of Tbr2+ cells was greatly increased in Slit1/2 double mutants compared to controls ( Figures 4G–4I).