2002) or of suboptimal quality (Österblom et al. 2008). According to life history theory, for top predators such as marine mammals that require energy-rich prey in high densities, food shortages will lead to reduced body condition and hence reduced reproductive output (Stearns 1976, Le Boeuf 1994, Greene and Pershing 2004). Thus predation GS-1101 order pressure exerted by natural top predators is self-regulating within the ecosystem, whereas predation from fisheries

is not. Fisheries management aims to apply similar checks to fisheries pressures, with mixed results (Pauly et al. 2002). Lowered trophic systems, implicit with reduced availability of preferred prey, has exacerbated population declines in already threatened predators such as seabirds (Becker and Beissinger 2006, Österblom et al. 2008). An understanding of the ecosystem roles and life histories of predators such as cetaceans is key in developing effective conservation measures in ecosystems based management (Hooker and Gerber 2004). Direct observation of predation and food consumption of marine predators Palbociclib price such as fin (Balaenoptera physalus)

and humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) is challenging. Conventional foraging studies (e.g., stomach content analysis and direct observations) are subject to biases and are difficult to carry out under ecologically relevant timescales, particularly for wide ranging species such as cetaceans (Pierce et al. 2007). Stable carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N)1 isotopes are tracers of nutrients and energy through food webs in that they reflect the environment and prey from which tissues of predators are synthesized (DeNiro and Epstein 1978, 1981). Stable isotope analysis has become a frequently used means for exploring diet, foraging strategies, and migration in animal ecology (Hobson 1999, Newsome et al. 2010). However accurate estimates of: isotope

values, uncertainty in predator and prey tissue isotopes, tissue-to-source fractionation of Rebamipide stable isotopes, as well as turnover rate of the tissues used must be known before accurate modeling and interpretation of results can be carried out (Focken and Becker 1998, Phillips and Gregg 2001, Martínez del Rio et al. 2009). Stable isotope values of tissues such as skin, which for cetaceans can be sampled remotely by biopsy darting, reflect those of dietary sources over a time period that depends on tissue turnover rate. Turnover rates for skin have been reported to be between seven days and one month for humpback whales, although this has never been tested, considering the logistical challenge of controlled experiments on large cetaceans (Todd et al. 1997, Caut et al. 2011, Witteveen et al. 2011). Turnover rate for skin collagen in other mammals such as rats, beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas) and some dolphin species is 70–75 d (Hicks et al. 1985, St. Aubin et al. 1990, Rucklidge et al. 1992).