Gastroenterology 2001, 121:685–98.CrossRefPubMed 47. Vogel S, Piantedosi R, Frank J, Lalazar A, Rockey DC, Friedman SL, Blaner WS: An ISRIB order immortalized rat liver stellate cell line (HSC-T6): a new cell model for the study of retinoid metabolism in vitro . J Lipid Res 2000, 41:882–893.PubMed Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors’ contributions CJM performed most of the experiments, biochemical analyses

and prepared the manuscript. KW performed the majority of the immunohistochemical staining, ED and VL cloned find more all constructs, MK prepared human tissue for experimentation, LJL performed some of the Western blotting and RT-PCR. MCW designed and supervised the studies. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”
“Introduction

Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common hospital acquired infection [1, 2], which caused by contamination of the wound by exogenous or endogenous bacteria during operations. Once it occurred, patients would suffering EGFR inhibitor from pain, cost of treatments [3, 4], prolonged length of hospital stay, and intangible loss [5]. Delayed primary wound closure (DPC) is a procedure which aims at reducing the rate of SSI by suturing a wound later after proper dressing for 3 to 5 days [6]. The procedure was claimed to decrease bacterial inoculums [7] and increase local wound resistance from increasing wound oxygenation [8] and blood supply [9] from developing granulation tissue. It was firstly applied to traumatic wounds [6] and later was more widely applied to various types

of operations (e.g. colonic operations [10, 11], opened tibial fractures [12], gynecologic operations [13]) with demonstration of good efficacy. However, these results were mainly from observational studies that may be prone to selection and confounding biases. In addition, the DPC also has its own disadvantages RANTES including pain from routine dressing, necessity for later wound suturing, and increase cost of treatments [14, 15]. The most recent systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of DPC by including only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) found no benefit of DPC compared to primary closure (PC) in complicated appendicitis [15]. Since then, more RCTs have been published in which some found benefits of DPC [7, 16] whereas some studies did not [17, 18]. We therefore updated a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs which aimed at comparing surgical site infection between DPC and PC in complicated appendicitis underwent open appendectomy and other contaminated abdominal wound. Material and methods Search strategy Medline and Scopus databases were used to search relevant studies since initiation to November 2013.