Ons through assimilation can be used to determine the reasons explained to Ren. It is m Possible that Zuh Assimilated rer Cantonese Mandarin Cantonese T1 and T1 to T4, which has two allotones, high-level and high falling. β-Sitosterol This would correspond to a single category assimilation by WFP. SC occurs when two non-native phones alike S good or bad, to assimilate to a single native phoneme. Poor discrimination is predicted. The results of this study were with this proposal, because H Rer often with Mandarin Cantonese T4 T1 as confused. The pair Q2, Q3 can be used as a pair of category goodness assimilation m Possible interpretation. GC occurs when the two non-native phones assimilate to a single category, it is often treated better than the other. Discrimination is m Thirty to very good.
Here, the Mandarin T2 and T3, T2, were treated as Cantonese. Since Mandarin T2, BCR-ABL Pathway T3 says, t that phonetically Cantonese is similar to T2, must have Zuh rer A tendency to choose Cantonese Mandarin T2 as best match in most cases Fill w. Our conclusion that the Cantonese Zuh Rer Q2 Q3 was confused as a target in line with this hypothesis. There are two m Possible reasons for this trend. First, Cantonese high rising tone phonetically Mandarin T2 similar in terms of modes F0. Both are described with the same letter of the literature. The Cantonese T2 is a pattern and produced downwards, and T2 is the Mandarin. On the other hand is the Cantonese tonal system does not have a sound that corresponds to Mandarin phonological T3.
If you go to a speaker in Mandarin, Cantonese T3 h Rt, the best candidate is a T2 concerning in Cantonese, Mandarin, T2 and T3 Chtliche Be Ufen similarity in their Tonh Henverl. Closing Lich, the pair Q1 Q2 a pair of two-category assimilation for Cantonese Zuh Have rer. TC is formed when two non-native phones assimilate to two different native phonemes. A distinction between non-native contrasts in these cases F Should be excellent. Mandarin T1 and T2 can k Perfectly to the Cantonese T1 and T2 can be equated, respectively. since the two T ne perfectly matched two separate T in Mandarin ne Cantonese, as evidenced by the results of this study, the Zuh rer not Cantonese problems in the identification of Mandarin T1 and T2 compared to English and Japanese Zuh rer .
Our results raise an interesting question: WFP provides that auditors have more difficulty perceiving contrasts the SC pair is looking forward t have the GC pair, but, interestingly, had the Cantonese Zuh rer can be seen in this study, more problems, the contrast tone in the GC pair as a couple SC. This can lead to events that have the Cantonese has certain temporary NEN Re differences between the T On the phonetic level, organizations such as the penetration into T, Which traditionally are considered variations of the three short T Ne level seen in each case based. In addition, T4 Cantonese the shortest in the system and easily from other five phonemic T to NEN Differ. Sun native Cantonese is still sensitive to the L Length of the vowel difference, and use it as a perception index in Mandarin T1 and T4 differentiate. should be excellent. But in this study were Japanese Zuh Rer difficulties i