(2010) were taken directly from that selleck chemicals study using the exact significance and extent criteria described previously. The only modifications made were to limit (mask) the regions so they did not extend beyond relevant anatomical boundaries, as defined in the Talairach atlas (file TT_N27_EZ_ML) included in AFNI (Lancaster et al., 2000). This served to ensure (1) that the functional ROIs did not overlap and (2) that they lay within defined anatomical regions. The ROIs were also restricted to the left hemisphere to help maintain sensitivity to relevant connections while minimizing the number of comparisons. Furthermore,

activation during reading aloud in the previous study (Graves et al., 2010) was exclusively left-lateralized in the inferior frontal, inferior temporal, and middle temporal ROIs. The ITS region (red in Fig. 2A) was spatially bounded by the inferior and middle temporal gyri. The AG (orange in Fig. 2A) was spatially bounded by the

atlas definition of the AG. The pMTG ROI was masked to be spatially bounded by the PS-341 in vivo atlas definition of the MTG. The pSTG ROI was restricted to not extend beyond the atlas definition of the superior temporal gyrus and sulcus, and similarly for the pOTS (masked to only include areas within left fusiform gyrus) and IFG (masked to only include areas within the left inferior frontal gyrus) ROIs. Another region, involving temporoparietal cortex in the left posterior Sylvian fissure, also showed an increased BOLD response with decreasing bigram frequency (Graves et al., 2010). We elected not to include this region as an ROI because it has been linked more conclusively with sensorimotor integration during speech articulation (Buchsbaum et al., 2011, Gow, 2012 and Hickok and Poeppel, 2007), a process not of primary interest in this study, and because

expanding the number of ROIs would likely offer Dichloromethane dehalogenase little benefit while at the same time compounding the multiple comparisons problem. The degree to which imageability modulated RT varied widely across individuals, with 11 showing variable amounts of facilitation and 6 showing inhibition, for a range of β-weights between 2.4 and −5.9 (Fig. 1B). This contrasts with the consistency variable, which showed a quite narrow range of effects on RT across participants (β-weights from 1.1 to −1.6). Correlations between the behavioral effect of imageability and DTI pathway volume were examined for each of the ROI pairs of interest in Fig. 2A (and listed in Table 1). Pathways showing significant (corrected q < 0.05) correlations with imageability effects are indicated by solid lines with double-headed arrows in Fig. 2A (and bold font in Table 1), while pathways showing non-significant correlations are indicated by dotted lines. The more imageability facilitated reading aloud, the greater the volume of the pathway through ITS-pMTG ( Fig. 2C, β = 0.863, uncorrected p = 0.005, q = 0.032).