[27] have reported that the source of infection was not apparent

[27] have reported that the source of infection was not apparent in 44% of their patients with septic shock. In addition, patients with PASS can display findings related to specific organ dysfunction or failure. {Selleck Anti-infection Compound Library|Selleck Antiinfection Compound Library|Selleck Anti-infection Compound Library|Selleck Antiinfection Compound Library|Selleckchem Anti-infection Compound Library|Selleckchem Antiinfection Compound Library|Selleckchem Anti-infection Compound Library|Selleckchem Antiinfection Compound Library|Anti-infection Compound Library|Antiinfection Compound Library|Anti-infection Compound Library|Antiinfection Compound Library|Anti-infection Compound Library|Antiinfection Compound Library|Anti-infection Compound Library|Antiinfection Compound Library|Anti-infection Compound Library|Antiinfection Compound Library|Anti-infection Compound Library|Antiinfection Compound Library|Anti-infection Compound Library|Antiinfection Compound Library|Anti-infection Compound Library|Antiinfection Compound Library|Anti-infection Compound Library|Antiinfection Compound Library|buy Anti-infection Compound Library|Anti-infection Compound Library ic50|Anti-infection Compound Library price|Anti-infection Compound Library cost|Anti-infection Compound Library solubility dmso|Anti-infection Compound Library purchase|Anti-infection Compound Library manufacturer|Anti-infection Compound Library research buy|Anti-infection Compound Library order|Anti-infection Compound Library mouse|Anti-infection Compound Library chemical structure|Anti-infection Compound Library mw|Anti-infection Compound Library molecular weight|Anti-infection Compound Library datasheet|Anti-infection Compound Library supplier|Anti-infection Compound Library in vitro|Anti-infection Compound Library cell line|Anti-infection Compound Library concentration|Anti-infection Compound Library nmr|Anti-infection Compound Library in vivo|Anti-infection Compound Library clinical trial|Anti-infection Compound Library cell assay|Anti-infection Compound Library screening|Anti-infection Compound Library high throughput|buy Antiinfection Compound Library|Antiinfection Compound Library ic50|Antiinfection Compound Library price|Antiinfection Compound Library cost|Antiinfection Compound Library solubility dmso|Antiinfection Compound Library purchase|Antiinfection Compound Library manufacturer|Antiinfection Compound Library research buy|Antiinfection Compound Library order|Antiinfection Compound Library chemical structure|Antiinfection Compound Library datasheet|Antiinfection Compound Library supplier|Antiinfection Compound Library in vitro|Antiinfection Compound Library cell line|Antiinfection Compound Library concentration|Antiinfection Compound Library clinical trial|Antiinfection Compound Library cell assay|Antiinfection Compound Library screening|Antiinfection Compound Library high throughput|Anti-infection Compound high throughput screening| Relatively limited data are available on the type, frequency, and number of failing organs among women developing PASS. Respiratory failure was the most common OF among PASS patients, reported in 44% [27] to 70% [35] in local studies, and 34% in a population study by Bauer et al. [33]. Renal failure was reported between 16% [33] to 37% [35]. Acosta et al. [32] did not describe systematically the occurrence of failing organs in their population. Hematological dysfunction

was especially common, ranging between 39% [27] to 43% [35] of patients in local studies, and in 19% of PASS hospitalizations in a population-based investigation [33]. Neurological dysfunction appears less common, described in 8% [33] of hospitalizations to 11% [27] of patients, although selleck chemical Snyder et al. [35] reported “altered mental status” in 30% of their patients, without providing further detail. Only one study has reported systematically the distribution of the number of failing organs in PASS. Snyder et al. [35] found a single OF in 40%, 2 OF in

27% and ≥3 OF in 33% of their patients. Severe sepsis in the obstetric population can become rapidly fatal. Kramer et al. [30] noted that the time from the first symptom of infection to “full-blown sepsis” was <24 h in Vistusertib 39% of their patients and that among women who died due to severe sepsis, the time from the onset of infection to death was less than 24 h in 50% of patients. Similarly, Snyder et al. [35] reported a rapid deterioration among all PASS patients who died. It has been further noted by some investigators that a predominant focus on genital tract sepsis may mislead clinicians in their assessment of pregnancy-associated infections [36]. These findings underscore the need for prompt Protirelin recognition and timely effective intervention in patients with PASS. Because early clinical findings may overlap those of pregnancy-related physiological changes [25], while the site of

infection may not be readily apparent [27], heightened level of suspicion by clinicians is crucial for adequate care of affected patients. Microbiology of Pregnancy-Associated Severe Sepsis Patient-level data on the pathogens associated with PASS are limited due to the rarity of this complication in the obstetric population. Most of the available data on the antimicrobial management of PASS have been adapted from that on the microbiology among infected obstetric patients who are not necessarily severely septic. It is presently unknown to what extent these data apply to PASS population. When reported, microbiology data varied across studies. Escherichia coli was the most common isolate in the study by Mabie et al. [27], while group A streptococci dominated (32%) the isolated pathogens in the study by Kramer et al. [30].

Comments are closed.