3B″) and at this point the implant was clearly osseointegrated. The maximum amount of osseointegration was achieved by day 21 (Fig. 3E). Of 23 implants placed, 21 had primary stability and by histologic assessment,

17 achieved osseointegration (a 74% success rate). We evaluated the peri-implant tissue reaction to the surgery and implant placement, and focused on samples harvested on day 14, when implants had osseointegrated. The peri-implant mucosa appeared healthy and devoid of inflammatory cells (Fig. 4A). A junctional epithelium, composed of non-keratinized, invaginating epithelium had selleck chemicals llc formed around the neck of a non-enclosed implant (Fig. 4A). The connective tissue attachment was well organized and was in direct contact with the implant surface (Fig. 4A). In regions closer to the native bone, new osteoid matrix was forming adjacent to the maxillary periosteum (arrows, Fig. 4A). In mice, most implants projected through the maxillary bone into the olfactory epithelium (e.g., Fig. 3). Murine olfactory tissue, which is considerably larger in rodents, occupies the position of the nasal fossae in humans. We evaluated how these tissues responded to the implant. Fibroblasts had infiltrated the glandular olfactory epithelium and adhered to the implant without evidence of inflammation (Fig. 4B).

In other cases, Quizartinib research buy new bone formation was detectable in the fibrous tissue attached to the implant surface (Fig. 4B′). We also analyzed cell viability in the maxillary bone. Using DAPI to detect cell nuclei and DIC to illustrate the osteocyte lacunae, we noted areas of extensive cell death in the cortical bone adjacent to the implant (dotted

yellow line, Fig. 4C). The empty enough lacunae were exclusively found near the cut edge of the maxillary bone (dotted yellow line, Fig. 4C) and along the alveolar ridge where the flap was raised during the surgery (Fig. 4C′). This same DAPI staining indicated abundant new cells on the (unperturbed) nasal surface of the bone, along the new bone in contact with the implant surface, and along the periosteum (Fig. 4C,C′). Thus, the observed changes in peri-implant tissues are remarkably similar to the mucosal responses observed in large animals [28]. Furthermore, the results demonstrate how the standard surgical procedure of implant placement affects cell viability in the native bone. We were particularly interested in the impact of the osteotomy on the viability of osteocytes in the maxillary bone, because this has implications for long-term bone regeneration and bone remodeling at the site of implant placement. Using samples from day 14, we first distinguished between mature osteocytes of the maxillary bone (dotted line, Figs. 5A,B) and new osteoid matrix: Mature maxillary bone had a lamellar organization whereas the new bone was characterized by a woven appearance (arrows, Figs. 5A,B).