A simple and effective freezing medium consisting of 18% raffinose and 3% skim milk without any permeating CPA has been successfully used to cryopreserve sperm from many inbred and outbred mouse strains [26] and [43]. One of the interesting findings of the current study is that, in contrast to its effectiveness for mouse sperm, skim milk was not effective in protecting rat sperm from freezing injury, even sperm from very closely related species (i.e. rats and mice) have their specific cryobiologic characteristics and emphasized the importance

of developing species-specific freezing check details protocols. Compared to mouse sperm [33] and [48], there have been little success in freezing rat sperm [22], [23], [34], [57] and [58]. Yamashiro et al. [57] reported higher (39.3%) post-thaw motility for epididymal rat sperm in mKRB containing 0.1 M raffinose, 0.75% Equex STM and 20% EY. It has been widely reported that non-permeating CPAs are more effective

than permeating CPAs for both rat and mouse sperm freezing [25], [26], [32], [33], [37] and [57]. The current study also showed that freezing extender containing 0.1 M raffinose provided good cryoprotection for rat selleck sperm. In addition, while the protective effect of non-permeating CPAs against cooling [51] was reported, few studies showed ineffectiveness of permeating CPA, glycerol, during rat sperm cryopreservation [34] and [57]. In our previous study, TL-HEPES, SM, Lactose, Tris and TES extenders served as good extenders but SM was not effective against chilling injury [51]. On the other hand, extender containing SM and 0.1 M raffinose in this study was effective against chilling injury, but it was ineffective during freezing. Cryopreservation in extender

containing 0.1 M raffinose or 0.1 M sucrose prepared in TES medium with 0.75% Equex-Paste and 20% egg yolk significantly Edoxaban improved the sperm motility compared to TL-HEPES and m-KRB for both SD and F344 strains. Yamashiro et al. [52] found that cryopreserving Wistar rat sperm in m-KRB provided better recovery of motility (39.3%) and acrosome (89.3%) integrity. Sperm cryopreserved in mKRB in this current study had lower motility (16.7% and 15.0% for F344 and SD rats). However, in a recent study, Yamashiro et al. [58] reported lower post-thaw sperm motility (21.5%) when m-KRB was used as an extender. These inconsistencies in post-thaw sperm characteristics in epididymal rat sperm may be attributed to (1) uncontrolled cooling rate (2) lack of optimal sperm extender components and (3) suboptimal handling throughout the cryopreservation procedure. For example although mouse sperm freezing protocol developed by Nakagata et al. [3], has been universally used to cryobank sperm from thousands of mouse strains, there are still undetermined aspects of the freezing protocol that can lead to significant differences in outcome.