Absolute reliability data were also favourable,

although some people might experience moderate change in balance that would not be reliably detected by the scale. Furthermore, the absolute reliability data were only available for people with Berg Balance Scores above 20. The reliability of the Berg Balance Scale has been investigated among a wide variety of subjects, PF-06463922 supplier although both studies investigating the reliability of the Berg Balance Scale in patients with Parkinson’s disease used subjects with high Berg Balance Scale scores which incurred a ceiling effect. The results of these studies might therefore be considered invalid in terms of describing the reliability of the Berg Balance Scale for patients with Parkinson’s disease whose balance scores are in the middle or lower range of the Berg Balance Scale. This

review found little evidence describing the reliability of the learn more English language Berg Balance Scale in people with substantial cognitive impairment, although a Swedish language Berg Balance Scale translation (Conradsson et al 2007) suggests the Berg Balance Scale may be less reliable in people with substantial cognitive impairment. While the high relative reliability suggests the Berg Balance Scale is clinically useful, there is little specific guidance as to how confident one can be that a real change in balance has occurred between tests across time for individual patients. This review suggests that if an individual has a Berg Balance Scale score of between 20 and 56 and experiences a change of between 3 and 7 (see Figure 4), one can be 95% confident that there has been a real change in balance. Individuals may experience clinically relevant changes

in balance that cannot be reliably detected. Downs et al (2012) found through hospital inpatients with a Berg Balance Scale of 20 have approximately a 30% probability of being discharged to a nursing home, while those with a Berg Balance Scale of 25 have approximately 20% probability of being discharged to a nursing home, suggesting that a difference in balance which is only barely detectable with 95% confidence in any individual may in fact be highly clinically relevant. Changes in the average Berg Balance Scale score of patient or research groups have a smaller minimal detectable change than individual subjects. Thus, while moderately clinically important balance changes might not always be detectable with 95% confidence in individuals, they can be expected to be reliably detectable within groups. Researchers or clinicians who find clinically important changes in the average Berg Balance Scale score of a group of individuals might therefore be confident that the change was not caused by random variation.