In groups D and E, which are formed of the 22 countries with the

In groups D and E, which are formed of the 22 countries with the lowest UEFA ranking, there is a low selleck kinase inhibitor percentage of countries with a significant home advantage (40% and 33%, respectively). Except for group C, there is a tendency towards a decline in the percentage of nations with a significant home advantage in line with the Country coefficients, which is an indicator of the level of competition. If we focus on the analysis of the top five, we can see that the first five countries (England, Spain, Germany, Italy and France) have a very similar home advantage, as their scores hardly oscillate more than 1.3 points. In other countries, the rest of the groups prove to have an important increase in their heterogeneity values, oscillating between 76.10 (Bosnia-Herzegovina) and 50.

03 (Republic of Ireland), even reaching negative values in a few countries, which means that for them there is a disadvantage of playing at home. When taking into account the influence of the level of the team, the home advantage shows a significant association as there is a positive relation between the points won by a team and home advantage (0.721). The classification of a team in its league has an inverse association with home advantage (?0.674). These results contradict the study of Morton (2006) in rugby and Jacklin (2005) as both concluded that there were no differences in home advantage and the level of the participating teams. Differences also exist between the results of this study and those of Bray (1999) in ice hockey, as he finds that home advantage is similar for all teams independent of the quality of the team.

It is necessary to highlight the fact that in ice hockey, the possibility of obtaining a draw is lower than in football. In the matches analyzed by Bray over 20 years, only 13% finished in a draw, while in the present study the percentage is 23.9% of the games analyzed. However, other studies have obtained results similar to those of this research. The analysis of the category variable coincides with the conclusions of Pollard (1986), as in both studies, the lower the team��s category, the higher the home advantage. This finding could be explained by the fact that teams in lower categories suffer difficulties such as uncomfortable journeys, players having to work or study, lower level of the players in these leagues, or other factors like local pressures.

The same conclusion was obtained by S��nchez et al. (2009), who compared home advantage in the two highest categories of Spanish soccer and concluded that home advantage was higher in the first category competition. GSK-3 Finally, similar associations were found by Guti��rrez et al. (2012) in Spanish handball. Conclusions Fifty-two of the fifty-three countries that make up the UEFA territory have league competitions. Only in 32 of them there was a significant home advantage in league competitions at the highest level.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>