Information about 180 days of school breakfast

and school lunch participation during fourth grade for each of 1,571 children (90% Black; 53% girls) was available in electronic administrative records from the school district. Children were weighed and measured, and BMI was calculated. Each of a subset of 465 children (95% Black; 49% girls) was observed eating school breakfast and school lunch on the same day. Mixed-effects regression was conducted with BMI as the dependent variable and school as the random effect; independent variables were breakfast AZD4547 chemical structure participation, lunch participation, combined participation (breakfast and lunch on the same day), average observed energy intake for breakfast, average observed energy intake for lunch, sex, age, breakfast location, and school year. Analyses were repeated for BMI category (underweight/healthy weight; overweight; obese; severely obese) using pooled ordered logistic regression models that excluded sex and age.\n\nResults: Breakfast participation, lunch participation, and combined participation were not significantly associated with BMI or BMI category irrespective of whether the model included observed energy intake at school meals. Observed energy intake at school meals was significantly and positively associated with BMI and BMI category.

Proteasome inhibitor For the total sample and subset, breakfast location was significantly associated with BMI; average BMI was larger for children with breakfast in the classroom than in the cafeteria. Significantly more kilocalories were observed eaten at breakfast in the classroom than in the cafeteria.\n\nConclusions: For fourth-grade children, results provide evidence of a positive relationship between BMI and observed

energy intake at school meals, and between BMI and school breakfast MGCD0103 in the classroom; however, BMI and participation in school meals were not significantly associated.”
“The impact of cancer involving the peripancreatic soft tissue (PST), irrespective of margin status, following a resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is not known. The purpose of this study is to determine such an impact on a cohort of patients. Data from 274 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery by our team between 1998 and 2012 was reviewed. Of those 119 patients who had pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: Group 1 = R1 resection (N = 39), Group 2 = R0 with involved PST (N = 54), and Group 3 – R0 with uninvolved PST (N = 26). Demographics, operative data, tumor characteristics and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Operations performed were: Whipple (N = 53), pylorus sparing Whipple (N = 41), total pancreatectomy (N = 11), and other (N = 14). Median OS for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 8.5 months, 12 months, and 69.6 months respectively (P smaller than 0.001). Tumor size (P = 0.016), margin status (P = 0.006), grade (P = 0.001), stage (P = 0.