S2a and purity of the sorted cells shown in Supplementary Fig. S2b,c). Unlike the CD11c–CD19+CD24+CD27+CD38+ cells, the CD11c–CD19+CD24+CD27–CD38– cells were unable to suppress T cell proliferation in allogeneic MLC (Fig. 1b,c). Unexpectedly, FACS-sorted CD11c–CD19+CD24+ cells exhibited statistically similar

suppressive ability as the CD19+CD24+CD27+CD38+ B cells (Fig. 1b,c). In all instances, the lower T cell frequency (Fig. 1c) in the MLC was due to decreased proliferation and absolute numbers of buy AZD2014 live CD3+ T cells (Fig. 1c,d) and not to an increase in the numbers of dead cells (including T cells) or changes in B cell frequency (Supplementary Figs S3 and S4). We hypothesized that iDC could directly affect the frequency of the suppressive CD19+CD24+CD27+CD38+ B cells and that a potentially significant increase in their number could account for the increased frequency of B220+CD11c– cells in the PBMC of iDC recipients [31]. To test this, freshly collected PBMC from healthy adults were enriched into CD19+ cells. Of these cells, 2 × 106 were then

cultured in the presence of an equal number of autologous cDC, iDC (generated from the same PBMC) or PBS vehicle for 3 days. The frequency of CD19+CD24+CD38+ cells in those co-cultures was then measured by flow cytometry. Figure  2a shows that, in the presence of iDC, the frequency of CD19+CD24+CD38+ B cells was increased significantly. Furthermore, the frequency of CD27+ cells inside the CD19+CD24+CD38+ population was increased substantially. this website This increase in frequency was due specifically to an increase in the proliferation of CD19+CD24+CD38+ cells, especially the CD27+ subpopulation (measured as the frequency and absolute number of BrdU+ cells; Fig. 2a,b). Interestingly, exposure of the CD19+ B cells to the iDC increased significantly the numbers of viable cells in general (Fig. 2a, P2 peak in the LIVE/DEAD histogram very at the top). When comparing the segregation of the individual cell surface markers used to identify

the B cells, the only discernible difference is in the generation of two peaks representing the CD19+ population in the presence of cDC or iDC (Fig. 2c). There are no other significant differences in the segregation of the other markers used (CD24, CD27, CD38; Fig. 2c). Specificity of the antibodies and non-specific antibody binding was controlled by the appropriate isotypes (Supplementary Fig. S5). Gene chip-based expression analysis of the autologous DC used in the Phase I trial [31] revealed that the rate-limiting enzyme for RA biosynthesis, ALDH1A2, was expressed in cDC and iDC generated from PBMC of normal adults (data not shown). To confirm the gene chip data and to demonstrate that cDC and iDC produce RA, we employed a reagent (Aldefluor) that reacts with RA-producing cells to identify and measure the frequency of RA-producing cells by flow cytometry. In Fig.