The factors most strongly related to physicians’ use of predictive genetic tests for cancer were patient requests during the previous year and, to a lesser extent, Luminespib molecular weight the presence of local genetic testing laboratories locally. Adequate knowledge,

positive attitudes, and time spent for continuing medical education also had an impact on the likelihood of professional use. The importance of patient inquiries has been reported in the literature (Klitzman et al., 2012, Sifri et al., 2003, White et al., 2008 and Wideroff et al., 2003). In the current survey, physicians caring for patients who asked for cancer predictive genetic testing during the past year reported a 13-fold and 7-fold greater use of tests for breast and colorectal cancer, respectively. The fact that the physicians’ use of genetic tests appears to be guided, at least in part, by patient requests suggests that their decisions may be driven by factors other than clinical indications or clinical utility. These findings underscore the importance of the physician being ready to respond Selleck KRX-0401 to patient requests for testing by providing patients with information about the advantages and limitations of such tests in addition to offering genetic counseling when appropriate or suggesting other alternatives when testing is not indicated. This study has several limitations. First, a high percentage of non-responders

(approximately 20%) was registered for questions concerning knowledge. Therefore, knowledge estimates reported in this study (calculated on responders) may be overestimated because non-responders may be less informed. Second, because information about specialties was not available from the registries Ergoloid of the Italian Boards of Physicians, the survey could not be designed to assess the likely differences that may exist across specialties. Although physicians were queried about their specialty in the questionnaire, the number of physicians in most specialties was too low to perform meaningful comparisons, therefore, the variable “specialty” was not included

in the analyses. Finally, because a clear need to slim down the questionnaire emerged in the pilot study, only questions concerning APC gene mutations were included in the knowledge items concerning inherited forms of colorectal cancer, and questions on other gene mutations (e.g., for Lynch syndrome) were not included. APC mutations are less frequent but occur with a higher penetrance than other gene mutations. Previous surveys in the U.S. showed that physician’s awareness of commercial availability was higher for APC tests than for tests for genes associated with Lynch syndrome ( Batra et al., 2002 and Wideroff et al., 2003). However, it should be acknowledged that there are no data available in the Italian context to conclude if knowledge about APC tests is equal or different from knowledge about tests for genes associated with Lynch syndrome.