The UK National Ecosystem Assessment and the Natural Capital Committee, which reports to that minister, aim to determine the value of the ecosystem for society, again an economic imperative. Furthermore, there are highly political issues such as the causes and consequences of climate change and sea-level rise, of support for any industry such as http://www.selleckchem.com/products/BI-2536.html fishing which has a high political profile, and oil exploration in environmentally sensitive polar marine areas. In the case of nutrients and organic discharges

and eutrophication, politicians react to the complaints of tourists affected by harmful algal blooms and sewage on beaches but often focus more on the agriculture/farming lobby and jobs versus the costs of treatment. For example, reducing Trichostatin A mouse nutrient problems in the Baltic by closing down Danish and Polish agriculture would solve the problem but be politically unacceptable (especially as it would only export that agricultural production to areas outside Europe). As shown here, marine environmental management is trying to tackle the causes of problems (usually the effects of too many people and too many human activities)

and find solutions (trying to get people to act against all the competing interests shown here). This requires the ethics and morals of any sustainable solutions to be considered. There are many attempts at using future scenarios to determine what we need from the seas (e.g. the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) and each of these has to address individual and societal behaviour. As a simple example, we may use economic discounting in remediating environmental problems. In essence this relates to how we determine and calculate the costs of acting – for example, to reduce nutrient inputs and organic matter problems

we may now agree to build large treatment plants but pass the costs to future generations – i.e. to get those generations Uroporphyrinogen III synthase to pay for problems cause by the current population. This may be pragmatic but will it be seen as ethically defensible and morally correct? As described above, all of the marine management actions have to be accepted or tolerated by society and there is an increasing stakeholder input in decision-making. However, we have to acknowledge that some cultural considerations may take precedence. For example, some countries, such as Canada and Australia with their First Nation status and aboriginal populations, have special and legally-binding agreements which affect marine environmental considerations and management (e.g. BBOP, 2009). These may include ancient rights for exploiting sea mammals or for settlement activities on coastal lands which must be protected irrespective of all other considerations.