These findings militate for increased attention and caution in clinical settings. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.”
“A retrospective cohort study was conducted to determine if there is an association

between short-acting intramuscular (SAIM) antipsychotics used for acute agitation and length of stay (LOS). Patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who were dispensed at least one dose of a SAIM antipsychotic were divided into find more groups based on the initial SAIM antipsychotic received once admitted to a psychiatric unit. Electronic records were used to gather demographic information, LOS, and number of injections received during an admission. Cost was calculated from the number of injections received. One-hundred and thirty-six patients were enrolled. When comparing the haloperidol group to the second generation antipsychotic SCH 900776 group, there was no statistically significant difference, in LOS 16.98 6 +/- 9.56 days versus 17.59 +/- 6 11.52 days (P = 0.75), respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in both cost and number of injections between groups, favoring the haloperidol group.

Ziprasidone was associated with a shorter LOS compared with olanzapine, 13.57 and 19.10 days, respectively (P = 0.026). Patient characteristics should be evaluated when determining an agent for acute agitation. However, because literature indicates second generation SAIM antipsychotics are only noninferior to haloperidol; other factors should also be

evaluated; including impact on LOS and impact on hospital resources. This study indicates use of a second generation SAIM antipsychotic for acute agitation is more costly, requires more injections, and was not associated with a shorter length of stay when compared with SAIM haloperidol.”
“The molecule of the title compound, C26H26Br4O6, is located around a crystallographic inversion center. The dihedral angle between the central benzene ring and the outer benzene ring is 89.26 (1)degrees.”
“The social brain hypothesis (an explanation for the evolution of brain STI571 mw size in primates) predicts that humans typically cannot maintain more than 150 relationships at any one time. The constraint is partly cognitive (ultimately determined by some aspect of brain volume) and partly one of time. Friendships (but not necessarily kin relationships) are maintained by investing time in them, and failure to do so results in an inexorable deterioration in the quality of a relationship. The Internet, and in particular the rise of social networking sites (SNSs), raises the possibility that digital media might allow us to circumvent some or all of these constraints. This allows us to test the importance of these constraints in limiting human sociality.